As of late, many privacy class actions have attempted to invoke California's common-law invasion of privacy claim, arguing that it is a valid cause of action. The courts, however, have been reluctant to apply the strict parameters of this privacy law--which has high pleading standards--to data breaches and privacy class actions. By its very nature, this law punishes "a serious invasion of the protected privacy interest," which traditionally has required intentional or egregious actions. This common law is not a suitable substitute for a valid claim in privacy class actions and in data breach class actions.
The latest court to grapple with this issue rejected the plaintiffs' pleading attempt. It granted the defendant's motion to dismiss, with leave to amend, rejecting the allegations that the alleged capture of the keystrokes and other information satisfied the pleading requirements for this cause of action. The court determined that the amended complaint did "not plead any facts to suggest Defendants collected intimate or sensitive personally identifiable information or otherwise disregarded Plaintiff's privacy choices."
This is yet another ruling, which refused to stretch the bounds of this common-law claim to novel legal theories advanced by the creative plaintiff's bar. It is expected that other courts facing similar claims will likely follow suit.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.