ARTICLE
17 November 2022

Judge Albright Orders Third-Party IPR Petitioner Unified Patents To Produce Member Lists And Communications With Members

WS
Winston & Strawn LLP
Contributor
Winston & Strawn LLP is an international law firm with 15 offices located throughout North America, Asia, and Europe. More information about the firm is available at www.winston.com.
On November 9, 2022, in Textile Computer Systems, Inc. v. Broadway National Bank d/b/a Broadway Bank, et al., Judge Albright denied non-party Unified Patents' Motion to Quash subpoenas served by Plaintiff Textile Computer Systems, Inc. ("Textile") on Unified Patents, LLC ("Unified Patents").
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On November 9, 2022, in Textile Computer Systems, Inc. v. Broadway National Bank d/b/a Broadway Bank, et al., Judge Albright denied non-party Unified Patents' Motion to Quash subpoenas served by Plaintiff Textile Computer Systems, Inc. ("Textile") on Unified Patents, LLC ("Unified Patents").

In 2016, Textile sued three defendants in the Eastern District of Texas for alleged patent infringement of, among others, U.S. Patent No. 8,505,079 ("'079 patent"). Subsequently, Unified Patents filed IPR2017-00296 ("'296 IPR") against the '079 patent on November 21, 2016; this was ultimately unsuccessful.

Then, on October 12, 2021, Textile sued a number of defendants in the Western District of Texas for alleged infringement of, among others, the '079 patent. During this litigation, Textile sought third-party discovery from Unified Patents to identify real parties in interest to the '296 IPR, alleging that IPR estoppel applied not only to Unified Patents, but also to real parties in interest to the IPR and privies to be discovered through the subpoenas. Unified Patents then filed a Motion to Quash.

Judge Albright ordered Unified Patents to produce the following categories of documents for the dates spanning the original round of lawsuits and the '296 IPR:

  • Any communications and any agreements with any named defendant in these actions and with American Express, Discover, Visa, Mastercard, Jack Henry, Fiserv, Apple, Google, and Samsung, limited to the period from July 1, 2016 through July 20, 2018.
  • Documents sufficient to identify meetings, and documents used or exchanged during meetings, with defendants, American Express, Discover, Visa, Mastercard, Jack Henry, Fiserv, Apple, Google, and Samsung, limited to the period from July 1, 2016 through July 20, 2018.
  • A list of all Unified Patents members with membership agreements active between July1, 2016 and July 20, 2018.
  • A list of Unified Patents members in each of the content, cloud, transactions, retail, mobile, cybersecurity, open source, and networking zones with membership agreements active between July 1, 2016 and July 20, 2018.

External communications and external documents that mention or relate to Textile, Gopal Nandakumar, any related patent or patent application owned by Textile or for which Mr.Nandakumar is a named inventor, or the inter partes review of U.S. Patent No.8,505,079, limited to the period from July 1, 2016 through July 20, 2018.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
17 November 2022

Judge Albright Orders Third-Party IPR Petitioner Unified Patents To Produce Member Lists And Communications With Members

United States Intellectual Property
Contributor
Winston & Strawn LLP is an international law firm with 15 offices located throughout North America, Asia, and Europe. More information about the firm is available at www.winston.com.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More