ARTICLE
11 April 2022

ALJ Elliot Finds No Violation Of Section 337 In Certain Smart Thermostat Systems (337-TA-1258)

OM
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P

Contributor

Oblon is among the largest US law firms that exclusively practice IP law. Businesses worldwide depend on Oblon to establish, protect and leverage their IP assets. Our team of 100+ legal professionals includes some of the country’s most respected practitioners. Most attorneys hold advanced degrees in engineering, physics, chemistry, biotechnology and other scientific disciplines. Oblon is headquartered within steps of the USPTO office in Alexandria, Virginia. 
On April 4, 2022, ALJ Cameron Elliott issued a notice of his initial determination ("ID") of no violation of section 337 in Certain Smart Thermostat Systems, Smart HVAC Systems...
United States Intellectual Property

On April 4, 2022, ALJ Cameron Elliott issued a  notice of his initial determination ("ID") of no violation of section 337 in Certain Smart Thermostat Systems, Smart HVAC Systems, Smart HVAC Control Systems, and Components Thereof  (Inv. No. 337-TA-1258).

By way of background, this investigation was instituted on March 30, 2021 based on a complaint by EcoFactor, Inc. ("EcoFactor") alleging violations of section 337 by nine respondents in the importation and/or sale of certain smart thermostat systems, smart HVAC systems, smart HVAC control systems, and components thereof that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,423,322; 8,019,567; 10,612,983; 8,596,550 ("the '550 patent"); and 8,886,488 ("the '488 patent").  See our April 1, 2021 post for more details regarding the complaint and Notice of Investigation.  By the time of the evidentiary hearing, only the '550 and '488 patents remained in the investigation.

According to the notice, the ID found no violation of section 337 based on the following conclusions of law:

  1. Complainant has not proven that at any accused product infringes any asserted claim of the '550 patent.
  1. Complainant has not proven that any accused product infringes any asserted claim of the '488 patent.
  1. Respondents have proven the invalidity of all asserted claims of the '550 patent.
  1. Respondents have proven the invalidity of all asserted claims of the '488 patent.
  1. Complainant has not proven the existence of the technical prong of a domestic industry practicing any asserted claim of the '550 or '488 patents.
  1. Complainant has proven the existence of the economic prong of a domestic industry as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

We will post the public version of the ID when it becomes available.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More