ARTICLE
30 August 2021

Extrinsic Evidence Cannot Alter Meaning Of Claim Term Clearly Set Forth In Intrinsic

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
In Seabed Geosolutions (US) Inc. v. Magseis FF LLC (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2021), the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the PTAB's conclusion of nonobviousness...
United States Intellectual Property

In Seabed Geosolutions (US) Inc. v. Magseis FF LLC (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2021), the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the PTAB's conclusion of nonobviousness, holding that the PTAB erred in relying "entirely on extrinsic evidence" to "alter the meaning" of a claim term where the intrinsic evidence was otherwise clear. Finnegan's At the PTAB Blog explains the details of the decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More