ARTICLE
10 August 2021

ALJ Shaw Issues Initial Determination In Certain Portable Gaming Console Systems (337-TA-1197)

OM
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
Contributor
Oblon is among the largest US law firms that exclusively practice IP law. Businesses worldwide depend on Oblon to establish, protect and leverage their IP assets. Our team of 100+ legal professionals includes some of the country’s most respected practitioners. Most attorneys hold advanced degrees in engineering, physics, chemistry, biotechnology and other scientific disciplines. Oblon is headquartered within steps of the USPTO office in Alexandria, Virginia. 
On July 28, 2021, ALJ David P. Shaw released the public version (see Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV) of his initial determination ("ID") in Certain Portable Gaming Console Systems...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On July 28, 2021, ALJ David P. Shaw released the public version (see Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV) of his initial determination ("ID") in Certain Portable Gaming Console Systems with Attachable Handheld Controllers and Components Thereof II (Inv. No. 337-TA-1197) finding no violation of section 337.

By way of background, this investigation was instituted on May 4, 2020 based on a March 27, 2020 complaint filed by Gamevice, Inc. of Simi Valley, California ("Gamevice") alleging violations of section 337 by Respondents Nintendo Co., Ltd. of Kyoto, Japan and Nintendo of America, Inc. of Redmond, Washington (collectively, "Nintendo") through the importation and/or sale of certain portable gaming console systems with attachable handheld controller and components thereof that infringed one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,391,393 ("the '393 patent").

According to the ID, ALJ Shaw determined that there was no violation of section 337 with respect to the '393 patent based on the following conclusions of law:

  • Nintendo's accused products do not infringe asserted claims 1-4, 6-8, 12, and 17-18 of the '393 patent;
  • The domestic industry requirement is satisfied as to the '393 patent;
  • Nintendo has shown that asserted claims 16, 18, 20 and 22 are indefinite;
  • Nintendo has shown, through clear and convincing evidence, that MOGA in view of iPhone renders obvious claim 8;
  • Nintendo has shown, through clear and convincing evidence, that Schoenith in view of Kessler render obvious claims 1-4, 6-7, and 17;
  • Nintendo has not shown, through clear and convincing evidence, that the asserted claims are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112(a);
  • Nintendo has not shown that any asserted claims of the '393 patent are unenforceable, or barred under the Kessler doctrine or issue preclusion.

ALJ Shaw recommended that the Commission issue a limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist order directed to Nintendo.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
10 August 2021

ALJ Shaw Issues Initial Determination In Certain Portable Gaming Console Systems (337-TA-1197)

United States Intellectual Property
Contributor
Oblon is among the largest US law firms that exclusively practice IP law. Businesses worldwide depend on Oblon to establish, protect and leverage their IP assets. Our team of 100+ legal professionals includes some of the country’s most respected practitioners. Most attorneys hold advanced degrees in engineering, physics, chemistry, biotechnology and other scientific disciplines. Oblon is headquartered within steps of the USPTO office in Alexandria, Virginia. 
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More