ARTICLE
29 April 2021

Prosecution Pointer 274

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
If a reply to a non-final Office Action is a non-compliant amendment, the examiner should not enter the amendment on the merits unless the amendment would otherwise place the application...
United States Intellectual Property

If a reply to a non-final Office Action is a non-compliant amendment, the examiner should not enter the amendment on the merits unless the amendment would otherwise place the application in condition for allowance and the non-compliance is minor. An examiner may correct the non-compliance through an examiner's amendment and allow the application.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More