ARTICLE
4 February 2021

Federal Circuit Reiterates Motions To Transfer Take Top Priority

WS
Winston & Strawn LLP

Contributor

Winston & Strawn LLP is an international law firm with 15 offices located throughout North America, Asia, and Europe. More information about the firm is available at www.winston.com.
The Federal Circuit doubles down on its Apple decision finding that "the district court's handling of the transfer motion up until this point in the case has amounted to egregious delay and blatant disregard for precedent."
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In re SK Hynix Inc., Case No. 2021-113 (Feb. 1, 2021). 

The Federal Circuit doubles down on  its  Apple  decision  finding that "the district court's handling of the transfer motion up until this point in the case has amounted to egregious delay and blatant disregard for precedent." Specifically, Judge Moore writing for the court reiterated that "'[a]lthough district courts have discretion as to how to handle their dockets, once a party files a transfer motion, disposing of that motion should unquestionably take top priority.'" (citing  In re Apple, Inc., 979 F.3d 1332, 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2020). 

Here, the plaintiff filed the patent infringement suit in March 2020 in the Western District of Texas, and the defendants moved to transfer to the Central District of California on May 4, 2020. The motion has been ripe for ruling since May 26, 2020. In the meantime, the parties were engaged in extensive discovery and the  Markman  hearing was set for March 19, 2021. On December 15, 2020, the defendants moved to stay proceedings pending disposition of the transfer motion, which the district court denied. The defendants then filed their petition for a writ of mandamus. Shortly thereafter, the district court set the motion to transfer hearing for February 2, 2021.  

The Federal Circuit noted that the Western District had not given appropriate priority to the transfer motion, "as it simply lingered unnecessarily on the docket while the district court required the parties to proceed ahead with the merits." The court ultimately directed the Western District of Texas to stay all proceedings concerning the substantive issues in the case until such time that it has issued a ruling on the transfer motion. The Federal Circuit also ordered the parties to "inform the court when the district court has issued such an opinion."

View the Federal Circuit's order  here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More