Court Of International Trade (CIT) Decision On Keg Order Addresses Alleged Forced Labor Concerns

CM
Crowell & Moring LLP
Contributor
Our founders aspired to create a different kind of law firm when they launched Crowell & Moring in 1979. From those bold beginnings, our mission has been to provide our clients with the best services of any law firm in the world through a spirit of trust, respect, cooperation, collaboration, and a commitment to giving back to the communities around us.
On March 23, 2021, CIT Judge M. Miller Baker ruled largely in favor of Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the agency record regarding concerns that labor cost data was compromised by forced labor.
Worldwide International Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On March 23, 2021, CIT Judge M. Miller Baker ruled largely in favor of Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the agency record regarding concerns that labor cost data was compromised by forced labor. The Plaintiff, New American Keg, a domestic manufacturer that called on the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) to investigate keg imports in 2018. It claimed it had been pushed to the brink of bankruptcy by foreign competitors.

While the DOC set a 77.13 percent dumping margin for Chinese exporters in 2019, one of the major Chinese exporters, Ningbo Master International Trade Co. Ltd., and two smaller companies, were able to avoid the country rate after being found not to under state-control. Further, after submitting a revised set of financial data, DOC reduced Ningbo's margin below the de minimis threshold.

New American Keg argued that the DOC made errors in calculating labor costs (by ignoring evidence of child and forced labor) and failed to appropriately verify the updated financial data that allowed Ningbo to escape the 77.13 percent country rate. New American Keg also disagreed with the DOC's assessment that the two smaller producers were free from Chinese government control, therefore also allowing them to avoid the 77.13 percent country rate.

The March 23 CIT order remanded the following items for further consideration:

  1. Commerce's decision to rely on surrogate value data from Malaysia to value the labor factor of production in calculating Ningbo Master's rate
  2. Commerce's ostensible verification of corrective material submitted by Ningbo Master
  3. Commerce's decision to grant separate rate status to Guangzhou Ulix Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd.

The CIT also ordered that the case proceeds on the following schedule:

  1. Commerce must file its remand determination on or before 120 days after the date of entry of this opinion and order;
  2. Commerce must file the administrative record on or before 14 days after the date on which it files the remand determination; and
  3. Court will issue a scheduling order after Commerce files the administrative record.

The full order can be found here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Court Of International Trade (CIT) Decision On Keg Order Addresses Alleged Forced Labor Concerns

Worldwide International Law
Contributor
Our founders aspired to create a different kind of law firm when they launched Crowell & Moring in 1979. From those bold beginnings, our mission has been to provide our clients with the best services of any law firm in the world through a spirit of trust, respect, cooperation, collaboration, and a commitment to giving back to the communities around us.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More