Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462 (2011), held that despite the 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) list of core proceedings that bankruptcy courts could finally determine, the Constitution precluded final decisions by an Article I bankruptcy court on a state law counterclaim not resolved in the process of ruling on a creditor's proof of claim. The Court later held that bankruptcy courts could utilize the non-core procedure for submitting proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the district court in Stern-type cases.
To read the full article, please click here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.