ARTICLE
10 March 2026

Proposed DHS Rule Would Revise Asylum‑Based Work Authorization Eligibility: Employer Considerations

GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Contributor

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has more than 3,100 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia. The firm’s broad geographic and practice range enables the delivery of innovative and strategic legal services across borders and industries. Recognized as a 2025 BTI “Best of the Best Recommended Law Firm” by general counsel for trust and relationship management, Greenberg Traurig is consistently ranked among the top firms on the Am Law Global 100, NLJ 500, and Law360 400. Greenberg Traurig is also known for its philanthropic giving, culture, innovation, and pro bono work. Web: www.gtlaw.com.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has proposed a rule that would, if finalized, restrict work authorization eligibility for asylum applicants.
United States Immigration
Natalie Gorelishvili’s articles from Greenberg Traurig, LLP are most popular:
  • within Immigration topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Retail & Leisure industries

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has proposed a rule that would, if finalized, restrict work authorization eligibility for asylum applicants. According to DHS, historic levels of asylum‑based Employee Authorization Document (EAD) filings have overwhelmed the current system. If finalized, this rule may have substantial implications for employers, particularly regarding I‑9 compliance, reverification, and payroll continuity for asylum‑based employees.

Key Proposed Changes

If finalized, DHS' proposed rule would:

  • Increase the waiting period to apply for an asylum‑based EAD from 150 days to 365 days;
  • Create possible pauses on new EAD applications during periods of significant asylum backlogs;
  • Cause longer EAD processing times, potentially adding delays to adjudications; and
  • Implement stricter eligibility and biometrics requirements, especially for applicants who entered without inspection.

Potential Employer Impacts

If DHS adopts this rule, employers may face:

  • More frequent and unpredictable reverifications;
  • Higher risk of work authorization lapses due to delayed eligibility and longer processing;
  • Potential staffing shortages, particularly in industries that rely heavily on asylum‑based workers; and
  • Payroll disruptions, since employers must remove employees from the payroll if their EAD expires without renewal.

Employer Considerations

Employers that face potential impacts from DHS' proposed rule should consider:

  • Strengthening I‑9 tracking systems to more aggressively monitor EAD expirations and reverification deadlines;
  • Communicating proactively with employees who hold asylum‑based EADs to manage expectations around renewal timing;
  • Reviewing recruiting and workforce strategies to prepare for extended onboarding timelines; and
  • Monitoring DHS updates and adjusting internal policies accordingly if DHS publishes a final rule.

This rule will remain open for public comment until April 24, 2026. If implemented, this rule may slow access to work authorization for asylum applicants and might increase unpredictability around EAD issuance and renewal. Employers may wish to begin preparing now in an effort to maintain compliance, mitigate disruptions, and protect workforce continuity.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More