ARTICLE
11 November 2025

CFPB Withdraws 'Fine Print' Rule

GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Contributor

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has more than 3,100 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia. The firm’s broad geographic and practice range enables the delivery of innovative and strategic legal services across borders and industries. Recognized as a 2025 BTI “Best of the Best Recommended Law Firm” by general counsel for trust and relationship management, Greenberg Traurig is consistently ranked among the top firms on the Am Law Global 100, NLJ 500, and Law360 400. Greenberg Traurig is also known for its philanthropic giving, culture, innovation, and pro bono work. Web: www.gtlaw.com.

On Oct. 29, 2025, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) withdrew its proposed rule that would have required certain nonbank financial companies...
United States Finance and Banking

On Oct. 29, 2025, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) withdrew its proposed rule that would have required certain nonbank financial companies subject to its supervisory jurisdiction to submit annual reports about their use of terms and conditions that attempt to waive or limit consumer rights and protections.

As we previously outlined, the proposed rule—formally titled "Registry of Supervised Nonbanks that Use Form Contracts to Impose Terms and Conditions that Seek to Waive or Limit Consumer Legal Protections"—would have required supervised nonbanks to register annually with the CFPB and submit annual reports regarding their use of "covered terms and conditions." That would have included any term or condition in any consumer facing contract, including website terms of use, that:

  • Limited the nonbank's liability by capping the amount of recovery or type of remedy;
  • Limited the time period, forum, or venue in which a consumer may have filed a legal action;
  • Agreed to arbitration;
  • Waived any claim or legal protection that a consumer may otherwise pursue;
  • Precluded a consumer from bringing or participating in a class action; or
  • Limited a consumer's right to complain or post a review.

The CFPB proposed this registry because of concerns that "standard form contracts" had grown "ubiquitous" and were increasingly presented in a "click-through" format, emphasizing that the consumer has no "meaningful choice" whether to agree.1 In its withdrawal notice, the CFPB acknowledged industry concerns, stating that it agreed "with commenters that the burdens would have been unduly high and unwarranted, particularly in light of the speculative nature of the benefits."2 The CFPB also critiqued how the proposed rule would have captured terms that are lawful, and in some cases, encouraged.3

Takeaways

The CFPB's proposed rule would have required thousands of supervised nonbanks to either revise consumer-facing contracts to make them more consumer friendly or state to the CFPB (and the world) publicly that the nonbank uses terms and conditions that, in the view of some, pose risks to consumers.

While the withdrawal may be welcomed by supervised nonbanks, industry participants should remain alert for the possibility that state regulators may pursue similar registry requirements.

Footnotes

1. 88 Fed. Reg. 6906, 6908 (Feb. 1, 2023).

2. 90 Fed. Reg. 48787, 48787 (Oct. 29, 2025).

3. Id. at 48787 & n.3.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More