ARTICLE
12 February 2025

California AB 3108 Creates Potential Mortgage Fraud Issue For Lenders On Owner-Occupied Mortgage Loans Made For A Business Purpose

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
California Assembly Bill 3108 became effective on January 1, 2025 and could conceivably make certain business purpose loans secured by owner-occupied...
United States California Finance and Banking
A.J. Dhaliwal’s articles from Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Aerospace & Defence industries
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

California Assembly Bill 3108 became effective on January 1, 2025 and could conceivably make certain business purpose loans secured by owner-occupied property subject to mortgage fraud claims by the borrowers. The primary goal of the new law—passed unanimously by the State Assembly and nearly unanimously by the State Senate (with one apparent absentee)—is to protect borrowers from certain predatory practices by mortgage lenders and brokers. However, unintended consequences may arise.

Assembly Bill 3108 makes it felony mortgage fraud for a "mortgage broker or person who originates a loan" to intentionally:

  1. Instruct or otherwise deliberately cause a borrower to sign documents reflecting the terms of a business, commercial, or agricultural loan, with knowledge that the borrower intends to use the loan proceeds primarily for personal, family, or household use.
  2. Instruct or otherwise deliberately causes a borrower to sign documents reflecting the terms of a bridge loan, with knowledge that the loan proceeds will be not used to acquire or construct a new dwelling. For purposes of this subdivision, a bridge loan is any temporary loan, having a maturity of one year or less, for the purpose of acquisition or construction of a dwelling intended to become the consumer's principal dwelling.

This law is clearly intended to go after bad actors with respect to both mortgage loans and bridge loans. However, it also opens up the possibility that a delinquent or defaulting borrower with a business purpose loan could claim that the mortgage lender or broker committed a felony by persuading the borrower to claim that the loan was made for business purposes when the lender knew that the loan was actually for personal purposes.

Putting It Into Practice: All mortgage lenders and mortgage brokers should have policies in place for determining and documenting when loans are made for business purposes. This is the time to review those policies and make sure they are as protective as possible. At a minimum, those policies should include the following:

  • Obtain a handwritten letter signed in the lender's presence by the borrower detailing the business purpose of the loan.
  • Gather corroborating evidence of the business purpose, such as financial statements and invoices.
  • Have the applicant sign a business purpose certificate.
  • If possible, fund the loan proceeds to a business bank account.
  • Consider recording a telephone conversation with the applicant discussing the business purpose, but be sure to inform the applicant that the call is being recorded, as required by California law.
  • Consider obtaining a legal opinion from the borrower's counsel.

Having these policies in place could significantly reduce the risk that a borrower will later claim that the mortgage lender or broker has committed felony mortgage fraud in violation of AB 3108.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More