ARTICLE
6 July 2022

Registered In-House Counsel Is Not An Option For The Government

AM
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

Contributor

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP logo
Allen Matkins, founded in 1977, is a California-based law firm with more than 200 attorneys in four major metropolitan areas of California: Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, and San Francisco. The firm's areas of focus include real estate, construction, land use, environmental and natural resources, corporate and securities, real estate and commercial finance, bankruptcy, restructurings and creditors' rights, joint ventures, and tax; labor and employment, and trials, litigation, risk management, and alternative dispute resolution in all of these areas. For more information about Allen Matkins please visit www.allenmatkins.com.
Last month, Governor Gavin Newsom announced the appointment of a general counsel for the Department of Financial Protection & Innovation.
United States California Finance and Banking

Last month, Governor Gavin Newsom announced the appointment of a general counsel for the Department of Financial Protection & Innovation. The appointee, a graduate of Georgetown University Law Center, had previously served as a Senior Attorney for several years at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. However, the appointment raised just one question - the appointee was not a member of the California bar.

California has several programs that permit attorneys from other U.S. jurisdictions to practice in California. One of these programs is for Registered In-House Counsel. This program allows a non-California attorney to provide legal services in California exclusively for a qualifying institution that employs the attorney. Rule 9.46(a) of the California Rules of Court defines "qualifying institution" as "means a corporation, a partnership, an association, or other legal entity, including its subsidiaries and organizational affiliates, which has an office located in California". A "qualifying institution" must either: (i) employ at least five full time employees; or (ii) employ in California an attorney who is an active licensee in good standing of the State Bar of California.

The rule, however, also provides that "Neither a governmental entity nor an entity that provides legal services to others can be a qualifying institution for purposes of this rule". Because this seemed to be a bar to the DFPI's employment of a non-California attorney as general counsel, this writer contacted the Governor's office for clarification. Late last week, I received a response. I was informed that the Governor's press release has been "updated" to state that the appointee will occupy the position of Deputy Commissioner at the DFPI and will not be serving as general counsel.

Related Articles

The Family Farm Inspires Nostalgia But Is Not Easily Defined

DFPI Proposes Rules For Commercial Financial Products And Services

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More