ARTICLE
24 May 2021

Firm Settles FINRA Charges For Suitability Violations On The Sale Of ETPs

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A firm settled FINRA charges for suitability and supervisory violations related to the sale of non-traditional and volatility-linked exchange traded products.
United States Finance and Banking

A firm settled FINRA charges for suitability and supervisory violations related to the sale of non-traditional and volatility-linked exchange traded products ("ETPs").

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent ("AWC"), FINRA found that the firm, among other things, (i) failed to address the sale of volatility-linked ETPs in its written supervisory procedures, exception reporting, and trading, and (ii) had inadequate procedures for identifying such securities. Additionally, FINRA stated that because the firm failed to ensure that its representatives understood nontraditional and volatility-linked ETPs' features and risks, such representatives made unsuitable recommendations and customers incurred losses by holding onto what should have been short-term positions for longer periods of time. As a result, the firm violated FINRA Rules 2111 ("Suitability"), 3110 ("Supervision"), and 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade").

Further, FINRA found that the firm:

  • did not offer educational materials to retail customers purchasing collateralized mortgage obligations, in violation of FINRA Rule 2216(b)(2)("Communications with the Public About Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs)");
  • allowed a registered representative to be supervised by an individual whose compensation and employment depended on the registered representative; and
  • granted a non-registered person access to firm systems to accept and enter customer orders, in violation of FINRA Rule 1210("Registration Requirements").

To settle the charges, the firm agreed to (i) a censure, (ii) a $250,000 fine, (iii) payment of restitution in the amount of $472,007 plus interest, and (iv) an undertaking to retain an independent consultant in accordance with the terms of the AWC.

Primary Sources

  1. FINRA AWC: Calton & Associates, Inc.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More