ARTICLE
14 January 2022

Hong Kong Company Settles Charges For Violating Iran Sanctions

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A Hong Kong-based offshore trading and cross-border financing company settled potential civil liability for apparent violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations ("ITSR").
United States International Law

A Hong Kong-based offshore trading and cross-border financing company settled potential civil liability for apparent violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations ("ITSR").

According to OFAC, for nearly two years - from August 2016 through May 2018 - the company purchased high-density polyethylene resin of Iranian origin for resale to customers in China. Employees at the company - acting without the knowledge of executive management and in direct contravention of company policy - omitted Iranian country of origin information from transactional documents, causing the relevant payments to be processed by U.S. financial institutions. This conduct resulted in the company's apparent violation of ITSR section 203 ("Evasions; Attempts; Causing Violations; Conspiracies") by causing the U.S. financial institutions to violate ITSR sections 206 ("Prohibited Trade-Related Transactions with Iran; Goods, Technology, or Services") and 208 ("Prohibited Facilitation by United States Persons of Transactions by Foreign Persons").

OFAC found that the apparent violations constitute a non-egregious case, and that the company voluntarily self-disclosed the relevant conduct. To settle the charges, the company agreed to remit $5,228,298.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More