ARTICLE
20 February 2023

Department Of The Interior Moves To Modernize Natural Resource Damages Regulations

AP
Arnold & Porter

Contributor

Arnold & Porter is a firm of more than 1,000 lawyers, providing sophisticated litigation and transactional capabilities, renowned regulatory experience and market-leading multidisciplinary practices in the life sciences and financial services industries. Our global reach, experience and deep knowledge allow us to work across geographic, cultural, technological and ideological borders.
Last month, the US Department of the Interior (DOI) announced an effort to reform key regulations for assessing natural resource damages (NRD) at Superfund sites. If promulgated, the proposed...
United States Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Last month, the US Department of the Interior (DOI) announced an effort to reform key regulations for assessing natural resource damages (NRD) at Superfund sites. If promulgated, the proposed effort could dramatically reduce transaction costs from Natural Resource Damage Assessments (NRDAs) and facilitate more cooperative settlements with potentially responsible parties (PRPs).

When enacting the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), which established Superfund, in 1980, Congress stated that there should be "standard procedures for simplified assessments requiring minimal field observation . . .". 42 USC 9651(c)(2)(A). The DOI attempted to implement this all-but-forgotten provision of CERCLA by promulgating regulations for "Type A" standardized assessments. But the promulgated Type A procedures are obsolete and are never actually used. 43 CFR Part 11.

With last month's announcement, the DOI may be getting serious about simplifying NRDAs. Specifically, the DOI is inviting comments on using equivalency models (such as habitat equivalency analysis) in lieu of extensive and expensive data collection at many NRD sites.

The DOI request for comment closely tracks a proposal we made in 2018 (Standardizing NRD assessments, ABA Trends, Vol. 49 No. 6). Specifically, we argued that the DOI should, "modify the Type A NRD regulations to include equivalency models and PRP cooperation." We further argued that, "if the Trustees include both elements, they will enjoy the statutory rebuttable presumption, the PRPs will resolve their liabilities faster, transaction costs will be nearly eliminated, and environmental restoration will occur years, or decades, sooner."

While there are numerous implementation issues (as discussed in our 2018 article), this move by the DOI could provide a win for all stakeholders.

The DOI will be accepting comments through March 20, 2023.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
20 February 2023

Department Of The Interior Moves To Modernize Natural Resource Damages Regulations

United States Environment

Contributor

Arnold & Porter is a firm of more than 1,000 lawyers, providing sophisticated litigation and transactional capabilities, renowned regulatory experience and market-leading multidisciplinary practices in the life sciences and financial services industries. Our global reach, experience and deep knowledge allow us to work across geographic, cultural, technological and ideological borders.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More