ARTICLE
7 February 2022

Labor Arbitration For Virtual Work Issues Can Be Tricky

CO
Cozen O'Connor

Contributor

Founded in 1970, Cozen O’Connor has more than 925 attorneys practicing internationally in 32 cities across North America and Europe. We are a full-service firm with award-winning practices in litigation, business law, and government relations, and our attorneys have experience operating in all sectors of the economy. Our diverse client list includes global Fortune 500 companies, middle-market firms poised for growth, ambitious startups, and high-profile individuals.

Daniel Johns authored an article about how the rise of virtual workplaces during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to confusion for labor arbitrators who need to determine liability for off-duty misconduct.
United States Employment and HR

Daniel Johns authored an article about how the rise of virtual workplaces during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to confusion for labor arbitrators who need to determine liability for off-duty misconduct. In the context of labor arbitrations, arbitrators often have to determine whether employees can and should be disciplined for misconduct that occurs outside of the workplace. As a general rule, the greater the distance in time and space from the employee's workplace, the more difficult it is for an employer to hold an employee accountable for misconduct in the labor arbitration forum. But what is the workplace in a virtual world? In a virtual workplace, this question becomes much more cloudy and difficult for arbitrators to answer.

To read more of this article, click here. (Login required)

Originally published by Law360

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More