ARTICLE
26 March 2024

Is It A Bad Thing That ERISA Killed The Pension Plan?

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
Of Counsel Michelle Capezza spoke with Fiduciary News providing insights on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and whether it unintentionally contributed to the decline of traditional pension programs.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Of Counsel Michelle Capezza spoke with Fiduciary News providing insights on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and whether it unintentionally contributed to the decline of traditional pension programs.

Michelle commented, "In my view, the ERISA requirements for pension plans were not enacted to phase out pension plans, but rather, they were enacted, and are necessary, to protect workers and to ensure that they would receive their promised pension benefits in retirement, a promise upon which they relied. It wouldn't make sense for an employer to sponsor a defined benefit pension plan and make promises to employees about pension benefits if they can't meet the fiduciary standards and funding requirements for the plan, as well as all of the other ERISA and tax code requirements that go along with it."

SOURCE

Fiduciary News

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More