ARTICLE
24 September 2021

Court Finally Clarifies When Biometric Lawsuits Are Untimely Under BIPA

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
In a highly anticipated decision, the Illinois Appellate Court finally clarified the correct application of the statute of limitations under the state's Biometric Information Privacy Act.
United States Privacy
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a highly anticipated decision, the Illinois Appellate Court finally clarified the correct application of the statute of limitations under the state's Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). In Tims v. Black Horse Carriers Inc., Ill. App. Ct., 1st Dist., No. 1-20-563 (9/17/21), the court ruled that a five-year limitations period applies to some claims, and a one-year deadline applies to other claims.

Specifically, the five-year period applies to all BIPA claims that assert (1) unlawful collection of biometric data without written notice, or (2) issues relating to storing or transmitting it, or (3) claims involving the company's failure to develop a publicly available retention and destruction schedule. Meanwhile, the one-year statute of limitations period applies to BIPA claims that allege (1) improper disclosure or (2) improper sale, lease, trade, or profit from biometric data. 

This long-awaited decision provides much-needed clarity for businesses and entities involved in the collection or processing of biometric data that impacts Illinois residents. This clarification by the Illinois Appellate Court  provides more certainty with respect to when potential claims can be deemed untimely.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
24 September 2021

Court Finally Clarifies When Biometric Lawsuits Are Untimely Under BIPA

United States Privacy

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More