ARTICLE
9 November 2021

Do LLC Members Owe Fiduciary Duties? Yes And No

AM
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

Contributor

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP logo
Allen Matkins, founded in 1977, is a California-based law firm with more than 200 attorneys in four major metropolitan areas of California: Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, and San Francisco. The firm's areas of focus include real estate, construction, land use, environmental and natural resources, corporate and securities, real estate and commercial finance, bankruptcy, restructurings and creditors' rights, joint ventures, and tax; labor and employment, and trials, litigation, risk management, and alternative dispute resolution in all of these areas. For more information about Allen Matkins please visit www.allenmatkins.com.
Does a member of a limited liability company owe a fiduciary duty to the company and the other members? Section 17704.09(a) of the California Corporations Code states that a member owes a duty of loyalty and a duty of care.
United States California Corporate/Commercial Law

Does a member of a limited liability company owe a fiduciary duty to the company and the other members?  Section 17704.09(a) of the California Corporations Code states that a member owes a duty of loyalty and a duty of care.  Thus, the answer would seem to be yes.  This  subdivision, however, applies to member-managed LLCs.  If the LLC is manager-managed, Section 17704.09(f)(1) provides that these fiduciary duties apply to the managers and not to the members.  

In a recent ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Todd W. Robinson, citing Section 17704.09, ruled that a member owed no fiduciary duty to the plaintiff because the operating agreement made it clear that the LLC was manager-managed.  Hammett v. Sherman,  2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193434.   While the ruling is correct, the rationale is not quite right.  The operative document for determining whether an LLC is manager-managed is the articles of organization.  Cal. Corp. Code § 17702.01(b)(5).  

The plaintiff argued that the defendant members owed fiduciary duties because the operating agreement required that "Major Decisions" must be "determined, made, approved or authorized by the consent of Members holding at least 51% of the Percentage Interests."  Judge Robinson rejected this contention finding that this provision "does not suggest that Silver Strand is a member-managed corporation [sic]; rather, it sets forth procedures for making significant decisions for the corporation [sic]". 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More