ARTICLE
4 October 2021

In Some Cases, A Dissociated Partner May Remain Liable As A Partner

AM
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

Contributor

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP logo
Allen Matkins, founded in 1977, is a California-based law firm with more than 200 attorneys in four major metropolitan areas of California: Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, and San Francisco. The firm's areas of focus include real estate, construction, land use, environmental and natural resources, corporate and securities, real estate and commercial finance, bankruptcy, restructurings and creditors' rights, joint ventures, and tax; labor and employment, and trials, litigation, risk management, and alternative dispute resolution in all of these areas. For more information about Allen Matkins please visit www.allenmatkins.com.
The anomalously named California Uniform Partnership Act of 1994 specifies when a partner in a general partnership "dissociates". Cal. Corp. Code § 16601.
United States California Corporate/Commercial Law

The anomalously named California Uniform Partnership Act of 1994 specifies when a partner in a general partnership "dissociates".  Cal. Corp. Code § 16601.  Upon dissociation, a general partner loses the right to participate in the management and conduct of the partnership business.  Cal. Corp. Code § 16603(1).   One would expect that the dissociated partner would also cease to be liable for a partnership obligation incurred after dissociation and that is what the act indeed provides in Subdivision (a) of Section 16703.  There is an significant exception, however,

Section 16703(b) provides that except for registered limited liability partnerships and foreign limited liability partnerships, a dissociated partner is liable as a partner to the other party in a transaction entered into by the partnership within two years after the partner's dissociation if at the time the transaction is entered into all of the following apply:

  • The other party reasonably believed that the dissociated partner was then a partner;
  • The other party did not have notice of the partner's dissociation; and
  • The other party is not deemed to have had knowledge under subdivision (e) of Section 16303 or notice under subdivision (c) of Section 16704.

Section 16303(e) deems a person who is not a partner to know of a limitation on the authority of a partner to transfer real property held in the partnership's name if a certified copy of a Statement of Denial containing the limitation is of record.   See this post regarding Statements of Denial.  Section 16704(c) provides that a person who is not a partner is deemed to have notice of the dissociation 90 days after a Statement of Dissociation is filed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More