ARTICLE
22 November 2023

FTC, Florida Settle With Chargeback Mitigation Company For $150K

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On November 7, the FTC and the State of Florida settled with a chargeback mitigation company and its owners for $150,000. The chargeback company was allegedly using deceptive practices, including...
United States Consumer Protection
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Strategy and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

On November 7, the FTC and the State of Florida settledwith a chargeback mitigation company and its owners for $150,000. The chargeback company was allegedly using deceptive practices, including referencing disclaimers that were not actually shown to the customers during the checkout process, to prevent consumers from disputing credit card charges through the chargeback process.

In addition to civil penalties, fees and other costs totaling $150,000, the agreed upon settlement will prohibit the chargeback company and its owners from working with certain high-risk clients and using deceptive tactics to stop consumers trying to dispute credit card charges through the chargeback process. The settlement, which was agreed to by the chargeback company, must be approved by a federal judge before it can go into effect.

Putting It Into Practice:This settlement sends a message that chargeback mitigation companies must not undermine consumers' ability to exercise their rights.Any fraud on the part of consumers must be demonstrated by legitimate techniques before denying a chargebacks to avoid suppressing legitimate consumer disputes or circumvent credit card companies' fraud monitoring systems.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More