ARTICLE
24 March 2026

NAD Decision Provides Guidance On #1 Claims (Podcast)

KD
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Contributor

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP is an AmLaw 200, Chambers ranked, full-service law firm of more than 350 attorneys and other professionals. For more than 180 years, Kelley Drye has provided legal counsel carefully connected to our client’s business strategies and has measured success by the real value we create.
The National Advertising Division has weighed in on how advertisers can and cannot make ​"1+" claims — statements that imply consumers...
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
This article from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP is most popular:
  • within Media, Telecoms, IT and Entertainment topic(s)
  • in United States
Gonzalo E. Mon’s articles from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Chemicals industries
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring, Antitrust/Competition Law and Privacy topic(s)

The National Advertising Division has weighed in on how advertisers can and cannot make "1+" claims — statements that imply consumers will get at least a certain quantity (e.g., "1+ hours of battery life") — holding that such claims must be accurately supported and not deceptive when the "+" is not meaningfully substantiated.

Hosted by Simone Roach. Based on a blog post by Gonzalo E. Mon.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More