ARTICLE
26 December 2022

NAD Challenge Addresses Disclosures For Money-Back Guarantees

KD
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Contributor

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP is an AmLaw 200, Chambers ranked, full-service law firm of more than 350 attorneys and other professionals. For more than 180 years, Kelley Drye has provided legal counsel carefully connected to our client’s business strategies and has measured success by the real value we create.
Money-back guarantees can often be subject to detailed terms and conditions. When advertising those guarantees, clients often ask us how much has to be disclosed...
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Money-back guarantees can often be subject to detailed terms and conditions. When advertising those guarantees, clients often ask us how much has to be disclosed in an ad itself, versus how much can be disclosed on a landing page. Although there isn't a bright line rule, a recent NAD challenge sheds light on what practices may lead to complaints.

TINA filed a challenge with NAD over a promotional email from The Princeton Review which advertised to students: "Score a 1400+ or your money back." An asterisk following the claim led to a "fine print" disclosure at the bottom of the email which stated: "Restrictions apply. Please see our terms and conditions for details."

If you clicked on "terms and conditions," you would land on a page with a list of "Better Scores Guarantee Eligible Programs." If you then clicked on "SAT 1400+," you'd get to another page with an explanation that the guarantee depends on a student's starting score. Specifically, students with a starting score below 1250 are "guaranteed" at least a 150-point increase, while students with a starting score of 1250 or higher are "guaranteed" a score of at least 1400.

During the challenge, The Princeton Review agreed to more clearly disclose the terms of its guarantee. For example, if a guarantee is dependent on a student's starting score, that information will appear in the claim itself, rather than in a disclosure. Moreover, links to the full terms and conditions associated with the guarantee will be provided in close proximity to the claim and the links will be labeled to communicate the nature and importance of the linked information.

Because The Princeton Review agreed to make changes before the case was decided, we don't have the benefit of NAD's analysis in this case. Nevertheless, we think it's likely that NAD would have come to similar conclusions on its own. Companies may want to review how they advertise their own guarantees, in light of this challenge. In the meantime, keep in mind that the FTC is in the process of updating its own guidelines on how advertisers make disclosures.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More