Proposed Federal Legislation Would Require Warning Labels And Advertising Prohibitions On ​"Junk Foods"

KD
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP is an AmLaw 200, Chambers ranked, full-service law firm of more than 350 attorneys and other professionals. For more than 180 years, Kelley Drye has provided legal counsel carefully connected to our client’s business strategies and has measured success by the real value we create.
On April 19th, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) introduced The Childhood Diabetes Reduction Act (the ​"Act").
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On April 19th, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) introduced The Childhood Diabetes Reduction Act (the "Act"). In a press release that positions the Act as having the same urgency as Congress's efforts to take on the tobacco industry 30 years ago, the sponsors' stated aim is to combat growing trends in childhood diabetes and obesity. As written, the Act requires the following:

  • Prominently-displayed bold-type boxed warnings on the principle display panel of foods and beverages with specific warnings depending on the product's nutritional profile. For example, for sugar-sweetened beverages, the warning must state as follows:

1460670a.jpg

  • Investigation by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) into the dangers associated with "ultra-processed foods".
  • Development of a national campaign for education and awareness through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

As written, the Act includes significant advertising prohibitions as well, such as the following:

  • Prohibit advertising of "junk food", defined as products subject to warning label requirements per the Act, in a manner directed toward children.
  • Prohibit advertising of "junk food" to the general population without including the relevant mandatory health or nutrient label warnings, as described above.

Violation of this prohibition will be treated as a rule violation under the Federal Trade Commission Act, meaning that the FTC could pursue civil penalties for first time offenders.

There will undoubtedly be much discussion among consumer brands as to how best to respond to the Act. As our readers may know, several of the nation's largest food and beverage companies committed years ago to an industry self-regulation initiative called the Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative, which restricted advertising directed at children 12 years and under for foods meeting certain nutritional criteria. Further, many of these same companies already use "Facts Up Front" - a front-of-pack labeling disclosure to provide specific nutritional information, as shown below.

1460670b.jpg

Will taking the next step and expressly telling the consumer that a particular product may contribute to obesity, diabetes, and tooth decay make a difference? We may find out.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Proposed Federal Legislation Would Require Warning Labels And Advertising Prohibitions On ​"Junk Foods"

United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP is an AmLaw 200, Chambers ranked, full-service law firm of more than 350 attorneys and other professionals. For more than 180 years, Kelley Drye has provided legal counsel carefully connected to our client’s business strategies and has measured success by the real value we create.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More