ARTICLE
28 September 2021

European Securities Watchdog Fine Highlights Importance Of Data Integrity And Regulatory Access

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU's securities markets regulator, recently announced that it fined UnaVista Limited...
European Union Privacy
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU's securities markets regulator, recently announced that it fined UnaVista Limited, a UK-based trade repository, €238,500 ($280,000) for eight breaches of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). The EMIR includes rules regulating the conduct of trade repositories, and in conjunction with its role as the supervisor of trade repositories under EMIR, ESMA is empowered to file enforcement actions in response to infringements of EMIR by trade repositories.

Under the EMIR, trade repositories are required to provide data to regulators, including access to details of derivatives contracts in the form of periodic and ad hoc open trade state reports. According to the Public Notice, between 2016 and 2018 the trade repository failed to:

  • Ensure the integrity of its data by providing incorrect field ordering logic, mapping rules, and crossed date boundaries, which led to generating incorrect or unreliable reports for regulators; and
  • Provide regulators with direct and immediate access to trade state reports and historic trade state reports, due to missed data exports and to non-existent functionality.

Based on these failures, the Board of Supervisors found that UnaVista did not meet the special care expected from a trade repository as a professional firm in the financial services sector, and had committed the infringements negligently and was liable to a fine. UnaVista may appeal against this decision to the Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More