Cascade Divisional Patent Applications In Mexico – New IMPI's Criteria Welcomed

O
OLIVARES

Contributor

Our mission is to provide innovative solutions and highly specialized legal advice for clients facing the most complicated legal and business challenges in Mexico. OLIVARES is continuously at the forefront of new practice areas concerning copyright, litigation, regulatory, anti-counterfeiting, plant varieties, domain names, digital rights, and internet-related matters, and the firm has been responsible for precedent-setting decisions in patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Our firm is committed to developing the strongest group of legal professionals to manage the level of complexity and interdisciplinary orientation that clients require. During the first decade of the 21st century, the team successfully led efforts to reshape IP laws and change regulatory authorizations procedures in Mexico, not only through thought leadership and lobbying efforts, but the firm has also won several landmark and precedent-setting cases at the Mexican Federal and Supreme Courts levels, including in constitutional matters.
Since the Federal Law for the Protection of Industrial Property (FLPIP) came into force, filing of cascade divisional applications submitted after November 05, 2020...
Mexico Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Since the Federal Law for the Protection of Industrial Property (FLPIP) came into force, filing of cascade divisional applications submitted after November 05, 2020, was restricted only to those required by Mexican Patent Office (IMPI) due to a unity of invention objection.

However, transitional articles of FLPIP provide that patent applications filed under the former law, should be prosecuted still under the former law, in which cascade divisional applications had no restrictions whatsoever.

Notwithstanding the above, IMPI adopted the criterion of denying all cascade divisional applications regardless of whether the parent case was filed either before or after November 05, 2020.

OLIVARES as a Law Firm, along with different Associations of legal practitioners, have been persistently discussing this criterion with the IMPI's authorities.

As a result of these efforts, we are glad to inform our clients that this practice has started to be modified in cascade divisional applications derived from applications prosecuted under the former law, and now they are being recognized as divisional applications sharing the legal date of the parent case.

Why we considered this change necessary?

IMPI had been rejecting cascade divisional applications deriving from applications prosecuted under the former law, not recognizing them as divisional applications.

Therefore, IMPI intended to prosecute such divisionals as independent new applications, considering the legal filing date as the date of its submission before IMPI, instead of the legal filing date of the parent case, which would result in a lack of novelty denial due to the publication of the parent cases.

Our position had always been that IMPI´s criteria was incorrect, mainly because our Constitution prohibits any authority to apply the law retroactively, and the previous law allowed voluntary cascade divisional applications.

OLIVARES is committed to ensure its clients that this achievement, although partial, is the first step for the proper interpretation of the Mexican Patent Law.

The OLIVARES patent team will keep you updated on any further development.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More