论外观设计的功能性原则

CCPIT PATENT AND TRADEMARK LAW OFFICE is the oldest and one of the largest full-service intellectual property law firms in China. Our firm has 322 patent and trademark attorneys, among whom 93 are qualified as attorneys-at-law. We provide consultation, prosecution, mediation, administrative enforcement and litigation services relating to patents, trademarks, copyrights, domain names, trade secrets, trade dress, unfair competition and other intellectual property-related matters. headquartered in Beijing, we have branch offices in New York, Silicon Valley, Tokyo, Munich, Madrid, Hongkong, Shanghai，Guangzhou and Shenzhen.

Explore

摘要：各国和地区为功能性外观设计包括功能性外观设计特征的判断创设了不同的标准，但是其出发点皆在于引导理论，以在外观设计与发明

China Intellectual Property

Authors

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

摘要：各国和地区为功能性外观设计包括功能性外观设计特征的判断创设了不同的标准，但是其出发点皆在于引导理论，以在外观设计与发明专利之间划出相对清晰的界限，特别是防止借用外观设计在事实上提供发明专利保护，进而侵入公有领域或者损害竞争。然而，若仔细分析功能性原则的实践及其效果，就会发现通过外观设计为功能性提供一定程度的保护并不会损害引导理论的法理基础。若以外观为外观设计权的保护对象，则有利于提高外观设计确权、侵权判断的客观性。建立于功能性与装饰性区分基础之上的功能性原则也失去了其存在的意义。

关键词：外观设计功能性发明专利

文章正文请点击此处

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Authors

Xiaojun Guo

Your Author LinkedIn Connections

See More Popular Content From

论外观设计的功能性原则

Contributor

Intellectual Property

Contributor

China