Conditional Fee Arrangements Now Permitted In Singapore For SIAC Arbitrations And SICC Proceedings

JD
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
Singapore recently lifted the ban on conditional fee agreements ("CFAs") in proceedings before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre ("SIAC") and certain proceedings in the Singapore...
Singapore Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Singapore recently lifted the ban on conditional fee agreements ("CFAs") in proceedings before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre ("SIAC") and certain proceedings in the Singapore International Commercial Court ("SICC").

Features of the New CFA Framework 

From 4 May 2022, lawyers in Singapore can enter into CFAs with clients for international and domestic arbitration proceedings (including arbitrations conducted under the SIAC rules) and certain proceedings in the SICC. CFAs are defined by the Legal Profession (Conditional Fee Agreement) Regulations 2022 ("CFA Regulations") to mean agreements providing for the remuneration and costs in respect of contentious proceedings conducted by lawyers in Singapore to be payable only in specified circumstances. Examples of CFAs permitted by the new framework include "win, more fee", "no win, no fee", and "no win, less fee" agreements. 

To mitigate the risk of any potential abuse of CFAs, the CFA Regulations require lawyers to provide specific information on the CFA to the client before entering into a CFA. Under the CFA Regulations, a CFA must state in writing the circumstances in which remuneration and costs are payable to the lawyer and, if the CFA provides for an uplift fee, the basis of calculation and an estimate of the uplift fee. The CFA must also provide that uplift fees are not recoverable and that the client is liable for any cost orders made against it by a court or tribunal. 

Impact of the New CFA Framework

This development brings Singapore regulations more in line with other English common law jurisdictions and opens the door for alternative fee arrangements in certain international commercial disputes. While the CFA Regulations are aimed at making Singapore a more attractive forum for business-to-business disputes, its success will ultimately depend on its implementation and the extent to which it is adopted by practitioners in Singapore and litigants. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Conditional Fee Arrangements Now Permitted In Singapore For SIAC Arbitrations And SICC Proceedings

Singapore Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Contributor
Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More