ARTICLE
15 January 2024

Singapore High Court Reduces Sentence In COVID-19 Vaccination Cheating Offence

In Newton, David Christopher v Public Prosecutor [2023] SGHC 266, a case involving the appellant's attempt to deceive the health authorities that he was vaccinated against COVID-19 when in fact he was not, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore (High Court).
Singapore Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In Newton, David Christopher v Public Prosecutor [2023] SGHC 266, a case involving the appellant's attempt to deceive the health authorities that he was vaccinated against COVID-19 when in fact he was not, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore (High Court) reduced the appellant's sentence on the grounds that the lower court had failed to appreciate that the harm occasioned by his offence and the culpability attributable to him were both "on the low side".

The Honourable the Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, sitting in the High Court, also issued guidance to judges against the excessive reproduction of one party's submissions as part of the court's judgment given that it is crucial not only to ensure that justice is done but also that it is manifestly seen to be done.

Our Paul Loy and Adelle Yii successfully represented the appellant before the High Court.

Please click here to view the full article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
15 January 2024

Singapore High Court Reduces Sentence In COVID-19 Vaccination Cheating Offence

Singapore Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More