After Justice Thomas' dissent in Polansky, we hoped it only a matter of time before a court followed his roadmap to hold the False Claims Act's (FCA) qui tam device unconstitutional.
That time is now. A former law clerk to Justice Thomas, Judge Kathyrn Kimball Mizelle of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, has just held in Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates LLC that the FCA's qui tam device is unconstitutional under Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
We will, of course, post a deeper-dive in Qui Notes just as soon as we've had a chance to analyze the opinion, which is sure to trigger an appeal to the Eleventh Circuit, setting up an eventual showdown in the Supreme Court. It is also likely to influence other district courts considering similar challenges. In the meantime, if you haven't already, please check out our posts on the Zafirov case, including our summary of oral argument and our other posts from June 2023, August 2023, and December 2023 regarding the constitutionality question. And, as always, stay tuned.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.