ARTICLE
27 January 2021

A Peek Behind The Curtain: IRS Musings On Spinoff Ruling Procedures

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
Speaking at several tax conferences this month, several senior IRS officials, including the Associate Chief Counsel, Corporate, discussed the nuances of the device requirement for spinoffs...
United States Tax

Speaking at several tax conferences this month, several senior IRS officials, including the Associate Chief Counsel, Corporate, discussed the nuances of the device requirement for spinoffs and signaled a willingness to relax its debt exchange representations required for spinoff private letter rulings. In particular, they discussed how the device factor can apply differently to cross-border transactions compared to equivalent domestic transactions due to Section 367. They offered little hope for an exception to device for section 367(a) gain, even when the hallmark of device, cash ending up in shareholder hands, is not present. Official IRS guidance on device may be forthcoming in the prioritized final device regulations, which are eagerly anticipated due to the breadth of the 2016 proposed device regulations and new policy considerations raised by the 2017 Tax Act. More helpfully, IRS officials also indicated a willingness to relax the representation that Distributing will "purge" the Section 361 consideration received from Controlled within 180 days of the spinoff to a period between 6 and 18 months. Similarly, IRS officials conceded that current representations regarding borrowing by Distributing after the spinoff may be overbroad and could be replaced with narrower representations designed to prevent only abusive debt exchanges.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More