This week, registered dietitian and creator/CEO of the popular F-Factor Diet sued Instagram influencer Emily Gellis (@emilygellis) for allegedly making "4,500-plus false, defamatory, and/or harassing statements" from July 22, 2020 onward.

Gellis, who regularly shares both organic and sponsored fashion content via her Instagram page, began sharing posts about the F Factor diet on her Instagram this summer after she was "inspired to action by an anonymous Instagram post from someone who said she was a former client of Ms. Zuckerbrot's" that "said she had been told she should consider going off antidepressants because they could be contributing to weight retention or gain" (according to a New York Times article published this summer highlighting the social media feud between Zuckerbrot and Gellis).

Since July, Gellis has been publishing content that claims the F Factor diet has caused women to suffer a variety of mental and physical health issues. 

In a lawsuit filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York this week, F Factor and Zuckerbrot allege that Gellis's over-4,500 statements published on social media to her over 280,000 followers were false, defamatory, and/or harassment.

The lawsuit claims that as a result of Gellis's statements, F Factor has seen a drop in revenue from over $1 million per month to less than $90,000 per month and has also lost a significant capital investment. Further, the complaint alleges that Zuckerbrot herself has suffered emotional distress as a result.

Gellis has stated via Instagram stories  that she plans to counter sue in response to the complaint. A Go-Fund me page has raised over $32,000for Gellis's legal fees.


This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.