Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
Proxy advisors, and specifically ISS and Glass Lewis, are in the business of advising asset managers on whether to vote for or against the thousands...
Ferrell Keel’s articles from Jones Day are most popular:
with readers working within the Media & Information industries
Jones Day are most popular:
within Criminal Law topic(s)
Proxy advisors, and specifically ISS and Glass Lewis, are in the
business of advising asset managers on whether to vote for or
against the thousands of director nominees and proposals that are
presented to shareholders each year. Together, they can influence
approximately 30% of a company's votes. As the self-appointed
quasi-regulators of public company corporate governance, this means
they have the power to both write and enforce their own rule book
on corporate governance. And because they charge companies for the
proverbial corporate governance rule book and will recommend that
asset managers vote against a company for failing to abide by said
rule book, companies are beholden to follow the standards set by
ISS and Glass Lewis.
This gives ISS and Glass Lewis an immense amount of control over
U.S. public companies, and yet they are subject to very little
regulatory oversight or accountability.
On April 24, 2025, I had the opportunity to testify (linked
above) to the Texas State Senate Committee on State Affairs
regarding the undue influence of proxy advisors and pending
legislation, S.B. No. 2337, that seeks to bring transparency and
accountability to the proxy advisor business. S.B. No. 2337 would
require proxy advisors to clearly disclose when their advice to
Texas-domiciled companies is based on non-financial factors such as
ESG matters. It would also create a private right of action for
companies and shareholders alike to challenge advisors for failure
to comply with the rule.
Stepping back, this legislation is interesting for two reasons:
First, it evidences the continuing effort to shape Texas into a
business-friendly state.
Second, it reflects a broader, national effort to hold proxy
advisors' feet to the fire. There is pending legislation in the
U.S. House to address proxy reform and bring proxy advisors under
the SEC's regulatory authority, and the U.S. House Judiciary
Committee is investigating ISS and Glass Lewis for alleged
antitrust violations, given they control a reported 97 percent of
their market.
The proxy process is ripe for disruption and reform, and the
proxy advisors are just one piece of the bigger puzzle.
Video provided by the Senate Committee on State Affairs (Texas).
April 24, 2025.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.