ARTICLE
30 May 2020

Federal Circuit Reaffirms That Software Is Patent Eligible

MG
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP

Contributor

Marshall, Gerstein & Borun is a full service intellectual property law firm that protects, enforces and transfers the intellectual property of clients in more than 150 countries worldwide.  Nearly half the Firm’s professionals have been in-house as general counsel, patent counsel, technology transfer managers, scientists or engineers, and offer seasoned experience in devising and executing IP strategy and comprehensive IP solutions. Learn more at www.marshallip.com.
In Uniloc USA, Inc. v. LG Electronics USA, Appeal No. 19-1835 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 30, 2020), the Federal Circuit reaffirmed that software inventions are patentable in the U.S. with a bright-line...
United States Intellectual Property

In Uniloc USA, Inc. v. LG Electronics USA, Appeal No. 19-1835 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 30, 2020), the Federal Circuit reaffirmed that software inventions are patentable in the U.S. with a bright-line statement: "Our precedent is clear that software can make patent-eligible improvements to computer technology, and related claims are eligible as long as they are directed to non-abstract improvements to the functionality of a computer or network platform itself."

The relevant claims involved Bluetooth communications and, importantly, were directed to an improvement in network communications, which the Federal Circuit described as demonstrating patent eligibility: "[W]e hold the claims at issue are directed to a patent-eligible improvement to computer functionality, namely the reduction of latency experienced by parked secondary stations in communication systems."

The Federal Circuit provided other useful statements concerning the patentability of software-related inventions:

  • "The claimed invention's compatibility with conventional communication systems does not render it abstract."
  • The inventiveness or improvement of a software-related invention need not relate to "physical" components; instead it can reside in the software elements ("To hold otherwise risks resurrecting a bright-line machine-or-transformation test, or creating a categorical ban on software patents.").

Because of the bright-line statements, we can expect that Uniloc USA will become routinely cited during litigation and AIA proceedings involving 35 U.S.C. § 101 challenges raised against software-related inventions.

Originally published 21 May 2020

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More