United States:
Reply Evidence Sufficient To Establish Printed Publication Status Of Reference
04 December 2020
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
In VidStream LLC v. Twitter,
Inc., Nos. 2019-1734, 2019-1735 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 25, 2020),
the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's holding that
Twitter's primary reference qualified as prior art under 35
U.S.C. § 102(a). In doing so, the Federal Circuit
explained that the PTAB properly considered evidence submitted by
Twitter in its reply brief that was not previously submitted in
Twitter's IPR petitions. For more detailed analysis of
this case, please see Finnegan's AIA blog.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
Are Your NDAs Up To Date?
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) can be used to protect companies' confi dential and trade secret information. But you should resist the urge to have a vendor...
Legal Implications Of New York Times vs. OpenAI
BoyarMiller
The New York Times recently filed a landmark lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of copyright infringement in the training of the chatbot ChatGPT which launched just over a year ago.