ARTICLE
8 October 2024

USTR Invites Public Comments On WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding China's Allegations That Certain Tax Credits Under The Inflation Reduction Act Violate The WTO

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
On August 27, 2024, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) published a notice to the Federal Register "invit[ing] written comments from the public concerning the issues...
Worldwide International Law

On August 27, 2024, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) published a notice to the Federal Register "invit[ing] written comments from the public concerning the issues raised" by China in its dispute before the World Trade Organization (WTO) of certain clean energy tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act. China's allegations concern "aspects of five tax credits created or amended by the Inflation Reduction Act, and related implementing guidance issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service, and the U.S. Department of Energy." The five tax credits are:

  • The Clean Vehicle Tax Credit (Internal Revenue Code Sec. 30D)
  • The Investment Tax Credit for Energy Property (Internal Revenue Code Sec. 48)
  • The Clean Electricity Investment Tax Credit (Internal Revenue Code Sec. 48E)
  • The Production Tax Credit for Electricity from Renewables (Internal Revenue Code Sec. 45)
  • The Clean Electricity Production Tax Credit (Internal Revenue Code Sec. 45Y)

For more information on China's allegations, please see our June 4, 2024, article.

As background, in March of this year, "China requested Consultations with the United States concerning" the energy tax credits "and related implementing guidance." In April, the United States agreed to China's request, and the two parties held consultations in May. The consultations were unsuccessful, and in July, China requested that the WTO establish a WTO dispute settlement panel to address China's allegations. The United States, exercising its right to reject China's initial request, blocked the request. On September 23, China made its second request, which the United States could not block, as the WTO rules do not permit a "member to block a second panel request." Therefore, China's challenge is moving forward, and the WTO will be forming the requested dispute panel to assess China's claims.

The USTR notice invites the public to submit written comments concerning the issues raised by China. While comments were due by September 26, 2024, "to be assured of timely consideration by USTR," USTR will continue to accept comments during the pendency of the dispute settlement proceeding. Comments, which must be in English, can be submitted via Regulations.gov's USTR-2024-0014 docket. Those interested in submitting comments should carefully review the Federal Register notice, including the requirements for submitting business confidential information.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2024. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More