CETA's Dispute Settlement Mechanism Compatible With EU Law - A Closer Look At The CJEU's Opinion

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
On 30 October 2016, Canada, the EU and its Member States signed CETA.
European Union International Law

Is the Court of Justice Opinion 1/17, in response to Belgium's concerns over the compatibility of the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) Tribunals and EU law, a further step towards investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) reform? Georg Adler and Ole Jensen, both at WilmerHale, consider the opinion and assess what it means for investment treaty arbitration practitioners.

Excerpt: On 30 October 2016, Canada, the EU and its Member States signed CETA. CETA is a so-called 'new generation' free trade agreement, which means that, in addition to the classical provisions on the reduction of customs duties and of non-tariff barriers to trade in goods and services, it contains rules relating to investment, public procurement, competition, intellectual property rights and sustainable development.

CETA's Dispute Settlement Mechanism Compatible With EU Law—A Closer Look at the CJEU's Opinion

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More