ARTICLE
16 June 2020

DC Circuit Court Denies Union's Suit Against OSHA To Force Emergency Temporary Worker Safety Standard

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) had brought suit in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals against the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
United States Employment and HR
Seyfarth Synopsis: The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) had brought suit in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals against the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, through an Emergency Petition For A Writ Of Mandamus, and Request For Expedited Briefing And Disposition, No. 19-1158 (May 18, 2020). The Petition has today been denied.

The AFL-CIO sought to compel the respondent, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), to "issue-within thirty (30) days of this Court's grant of the writ-an Emergency Temporary Standard for Infectious Diseases (ETS) aimed at protecting the life and health of millions of workers throughout the United States in grave danger from the deadly COVID-19 pandemic."

The three-judge panel denied the Labor Federation's petition for a writ of mandamus to make OSHA issue an "emergency temporary standard" covering the virus. The Court said that "in light of the unprecedented nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the regulatory tools that OSHA has at its disposal to ensure that employers are maintaining hazard-free work environments, see 29 U.S.C. § 654(a), OSHA reasonably determined that an ETS is not necessary at this time."

"OSHA's decision not to issue an ETS is entitled to considerable deference."

For more information on this or any related topic, please contact the authors, your Seyfarth attorney, or any member of the Workplace Safety and Health (OSHA/MSHA) Team.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More