ARTICLE
18 June 2025

DOJ Seeks Early Termination Of Lakeland Bank Redlining Consent Order

BS
Ballard Spahr LLP

Contributor

Ballard Spahr LLP—an Am Law 100 law firm with more than 750 lawyers in 18 U.S. offices—serves clients across industries in litigation, transactions, and regulatory compliance. A strategic legal partner to clients, Ballard goes beyond to deliver actionable, forward-thinking counsel and advocacy powered by deep industry experience and an understanding of each client’s specific business goals. Our culture is defined by an entrepreneurial spirit, collaborative environment, and top-down focus on service, efficiency, and results.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a motion with a federal district court to terminate...
United States Finance and Banking

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a motion with a federal district court to terminate early the September 2022 consent order with Lakeland Bank (Lakeland) that settled allegations of redlining under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The motion also seeks the dismissal with prejudice of the case that the DOJ brought that resulted in that consent order.

By its terms, the consent order was scheduled to end in September 2027, unless Lakeland had not fully invested the loan subsidy fund provided for in the consent order, in which case it would have continued until three months after Lakeland fulfilled that obligation and submitted a confirming report to the DOJ.

Supporting the request for the early termination, the unopposed motion provides "that Lakeland Bank has demonstrated a commitment to remediation and has reached substantial compliance with the monetary and injunctive terms of the Consent Order. Lakeland has also committed to continuing its disbursement of the loan subsidy fund and to provide the United States confirmation of that disbursement upon completion." (Citations omitted.)

The motion also indicates that the DOJ conferred with Lakeland, and that Lakeland did not oppose the motion.

Note, this differs from the recent early termination of the consent order with the DOJ, CFPB and Trustmark Bank, as Trustmark had fully disbursed the $3.85 million loan subsidiary fund provided for in its consent order, whereas Lakeland has not fully disbursed the $12.0 million loan subsidy fund provided for in its consent order.

Various consumer groups have filed appearances apparently seeking to challenge the motion for early termination, and it appears that the court will consider the motion on July 7, 2025.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More