In testimony before the House Financial Services Committee, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg defended his company's proposed virtual currency, "Libra." The Committee also considered several bills related to technology and the financial services industry.
Mr. Zuckerberg emphasized that Facebook would not launch the Libra payment system until it has the support of U.S. regulators. He warned that, while these issues are being "debate[d]," China and other countries are working to launch similar payment systems. He argued that since Libra would be backed by U.S. dollars, it would "extend" U.S. financial leadership. He also addressed several concerns, assuring the legislators that:
a recent white paper co-authored by Facebook (see previous coverage) was intended to start a dialogue with financial experts and regulators, rather than serve as the "final word";
Facebook does not intend to "circumvent" regulators; and
the intended purpose of Libra is to provide for the transfer of money through an online payment system, not to be a replacement for sovereign currency.
Mr. Zuckerberg also affirmed Facebook's commitment to preventing discrimination among Facebook's advertisers. To "combat" discrimination, he stated, Facebook has made specific changes to policies in order to prevent discriminatory advertisement targeting. For example, Facebook banned the use of age, gender or zip codes in housing and credit advertisements.
Committee members at the hearing discussed several bills concerning technology and finance related to issues raised by the testimony. These included:
H.R. Draft "Keep Big Tech Out of Finance Act" would prohibit large platform utilities (i.e., Facebook) from (i) being authorized as, or affiliating with, a U.S. financial institution or (ii) operating a digital asset that is intended to be "widely used" as a method for exchange, pursuant to the Federal Reserve.
H.R. Draft "Stablecoins Are Securities Act of 2019" would make clear that a managed stablecoin is subject to the same securities laws' requirements as other securities that are meant to protect investors, such as disclosure, antifraud and conflicts of interest.
H.R. Draft "Bill to Prohibit the Listing of Certain Securities" would limit issuers of stablecoins access to capital markets prohibiting certain trading on U.S. national securities exchanges.
H.R. Draft "Designing Accounting Safeguards to Help Broaden Oversight and Regulations on Data" would create more "transparency" on how consumer data is collected by requiring commercial data operators to disclose (i) the type of user data collected, (ii) an examination of how valuable the user data is and (iii) third-party contracts involving the collection of the data.
H.R. Draft "Diverse Asset Managers Act" would require SEC registrants to (i) consider at least one "diverse" asset manager when seeking asset management services and (ii) report to the SEC the extent to which diverse asset managers are used.
Facebook's attempted entry into the digital currency market accelerated the inevitable: Congress and the financial regulators are more closely scrutinizing the entry of technology firms into the financial markets. What was not inevitable was Congressional overreaction. While it now seems universal practice to refer to Libra as a Stablecoin, it is not: it is an asset-backed coin (try "ABCoin"). Because the managers of Libra would have had the ability to shift the assets supporting Libra, Libra is not stable. Because of the management of the underlying assets backing the product, Libra almost certainly would have been a "security," at least in the absence of an exemption, and therefore, it is not necessary to amend the securities laws to that end.
A true Stablecoin, whether backed by the dollar or another currency (or even a pool of currencies) may be issued as a custodial receipt that is not a security, and need not be regulated as a security. It would thus be a shame if such Stablecoins, which may very well provide an attractive alternative to other payment methods, were made impossible because of an overbroad reaction to Libra.
Mr. Zuckerberg is absolutely correct that the United States benefits if a global stablecoin backed by the dollar were to emerge. Facebook's principal mistake, which arguably reflects a certain lack of sophisticated understanding of financial regulation, was to go forward with a managed ABCoin, rather than a true Stablecoin.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.