HFSC Considers Impact Of Increased Digital Asset Use On U.S. Financial System

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
At a hearing titled "America on 'FIRE': Will the Crypto Frenzy Lead to Financial Independence and Early Retirement or Financial Ruin?," the U.S. House Financial Services Committee...
United States Technology

At a hearing titled "America on 'FIRE': Will the Crypto Frenzy Lead to Financial Independence and Early Retirement or Financial Ruin?," the U.S. House Financial Services Committee (the "Committee") considered the increased exposure that institutional investors and individual persons have in the digital assets markets.

The Committee addressed regulatory and financial concerns, including, among others, reporting requirements, illicit activities, market manipulation, and the inability to deliver promised products and services. The Committee also discussed issues of regulatory jurisdiction over the diverse range of digital assets, including concerns raised by the SEC, FDIC, CFTC, FinCEN, FTC, OCC and other federal regulators.

The Committee heard testimony from the following individuals:

  • Alexis Goldstein, Director of Financial Policy, Open Markets Institute. Ms. Goldstein requestedthat Congress determine what regulatory gaps require new legislation to safeguard consumer and investor protections in the cryptocurrency space. Ms. Goldstein recommended that regulators monitor the digital asset space, with respect to existing compliance standards and regulations, while new legislation is implemented to ensure that mechanisms are in place to evaluate systematic risks posed by digital assets.
  • Sarah Hammer, Managing Director, Stevens Center for Innovation in Finance at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Ms. Hammer emphasizedthe importance of balancing the benefits of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies with their potential systematic risks in order to foster innovation, safety and financial stability. Ms. Hammer recommended that Congress utilize the authority of the Financial Stability Oversight Council to align federal interagency efforts, engage with state regulators and confer with international standard-setting bodies. She also emphasized that Congress should establish a "clear, sufficient, and appropriate" regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies.
  • Christine Parker, Partner, Reed Smith LLP. Ms. Parker highlightedthe lack of support in the digital asset market from Congress under the existing financial regulatory regimes. Ms. Parker emphasized the need for Congress to (i) pass "comprehensive and meaningful" legislation regarding cryptocurrency spot markets, and (ii) establish a "logical framework" for the regulatory characterization of digital assets. Ms. Parker also highlighted two "areas of growth" in the digital asset space: (i) the development of non-fungible tokens, with respect to gaming, and (ii) decentralized finance more broadly.
  • Eva Su, Analyst in Financial Economics, Congressional Research Service. Ms. Su recappedcurrent debates on digital assets, and restated the consensus of policymakers, that the underlying objective of regulatory oversight of the digital asset space should be ensuring market stability and investor protection while maintaining an innovative financial marketplace.
  • Peter Van Valkenburgh, Director of Research, Coin Center. Mr. Valkenburgh arguedthat federal and state governments have robustly regulated cryptocurrencies. Mr. Valkenburgh stated that there is no need for new regulations, and that the CFPB, the FTC, the SEC, the CFTC and state attorneys general have sufficient existing authority to address the concerns presented by cryptocurrencies and digital assets.

Primary Sources

  1. S. House Financial Services Committee Event: Hybrid Hearing - America on "FIRE": Will the Crypto Frenzy Lead to Financial Independence and Early Retirement or Financial Ruin?
  1. U.S. House Financial Services Committee Memorandum: Hybrid Hearing - America on "FIRE": Will the Crypto Frenzy Lead to Financial Independence and Early Retirement or Financial Ruin?
  2. Alexis Goldstein, Director of Financial Policy, Open Markets Institute Testimony: America on "FIRE" - Will the Crypto Frenzy Lead to Financial Independence and Early Retirement or Financial Ruin?
  3. Sarah Hammer, Managing Director, Stevens Center for Innovation in Finance at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania Testimony: America on "FIRE" - Will the Crypto Frenzy Lead to Financial Independence and Early Retirement or Financial Ruin?
  4. Christine Parker, Partner, Reed Smith LLP Testimony: America on "FIRE" - Will the Crypto Frenzy Lead to Financial Independence and Early Retirement or Financial Ruin?
  5. Eva Su, Analyst in Financial Economics, Congressional Research Service Testimony: America on "FIRE" - Will the Crypto Frenzy Lead to Financial Independence and Early Retirement or Financial Ruin?
  1. Peter Van Valkenburgh, Director of Research, Coin Center Testimony: America on "FIRE" - Will the Crypto Frenzy Lead to Financial Independence and Early Retirement or Financial Ruin?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More