ARTICLE
15 March 2022

Shareholder Activism Or Divestment? The Massachusetts Pension Fund Chooses Activism (March 2022)

FH
Foley Hoag LLP

Contributor

Foley Hoag provides innovative, strategic legal services to public, private and government clients. We have premier capabilities in the life sciences, healthcare, technology, energy, professional services and private funds fields, and in cross-border disputes. The diverse experiences of our lawyers contribute to the exceptional senior-level service we deliver to clients.
The Boston Globe reported yesterday that the Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management Board approved investment guidelines that would have the Board vote against directors of companies...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

The Boston Globe reported yesterday that the Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management Board approved investment guidelines that would have the Board vote against directors of companies in which the Board invests where the company does not have a plan to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050.

As the Globe notes, there is something of a debate among climate activists whether it is better to support divestment or the kind of activism represented by the Board's action yesterday. In that context, the Globe noted Engine No. 1's success last year in challenging Exxon directors.

I think that the answer lies in the Exxon vote. If climate activists successfully pressure investors to divest, who's going to be left running companies such as Exxon?

I say, stay in the game. If climate concerns can win in corporate board rooms, who knows what can happen?

To view Foley Hoag's IPO, Then What? Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More