ARTICLE
28 January 2025

Why Doesn't The Crime-Fraud Exception More Frequently Swallow The Attorney-Client Privilege?

Criminal defendants accused of white-collar crimes often deal with lawyers before and even while engaged in their alleged criminal misconduct.
United States Criminal Law

Criminal defendants accused of white-collar crimes often deal with lawyers before and even while engaged in their alleged criminal misconduct. All or most lawyers have the vague notion that the attorney-client privilege can evaporate in such crime-related settings.

Several decades ago, some courts' expansive application of the crime-fraud exception seemed to frequently strip away such privilege protection. But courts eventually cut back on that worrisome approach. In one of the now thankfully rare crime-fraud exception cases, the court in T.T. International Co. v. BMP International, Inc., quoted a circuit court's now more correctly emphasized requirement that "the attorney's assistance was obtained in furtherance of the criminal or fraudulent activity or was closely related to it." Case No. 8:19-cv-02044-CEH-AEP, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212639, at *5 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 22, 2024) (citation omitted).

In other words, the crime-fraud exception does not apply simply because the otherwise privileged communications would provide evidence of criminal or fraudulent conduct — it must show that a lawyer assisted in that wrongful conduct.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More