This article is intended as a quick legal guide of some key points for busy Energy executives who need to manage business risk exposure when global supply chains are disrupted.
The first step is to review the relevant supply chain contracts. These may span multiple jurisdictions with different legal codes, with some providing for arbitration and others mandating litigation in local courts. This analysis will expose risks but may also provide opportunities.
Do these contracts include provisions which excuse or suspend performance obligations, such as an express force majeure term? While force majeure is recognised in civil law jurisdictions and is written into the local civil law code, it is not part of the common law applicable in the United Kingdom and its former Commonwealth jurisdictions. This is important because civil law typically supplements the parties' contractual provisions and applies force majeure provisions by default, common law applies the force majeure provisions only if they are contractually expressed.
Pre-pandemic, not all force majeure clauses were drafted with such matters in mind. If the pandemic's effects do not obviously fit into categories of unforeseen risk, there is less scope for relief for the contract based on common law, as the doctrine of frustration is stricter in its application than the civil law concept of force majeure.
In contrast, Middle Eastern jurisdictions are generally based on a combination of common, civil, statutory and sharia law, which may supply additional remedies beyond those contractually provided. Emergency legislation in certain countries may add further layers of protection (or interference) with the parties' contractual bargain.
Renegotiation of existing contracts
One mitigation strategy is to re-negotiate the basis of contractual arrangements to cater for the fractured supply chain. This may involve re-allocating risks of labour shortages and/or delayed delivery of components, with an extension of time and relief from liquidated damages subject to bearing the increased costs of resources needed to comply with local restrictions. Business needs to continue in a way that recognises the new realities of the post-pandemic economy.
New contractual frameworks
The need for stronger and more diverse supply chains with a larger number of suppliers in different locations is now apparent. Bespoke structuring of force majeure provisions should become the norm and more flexibility, allowing for the purchaser to switch to an alternative supplier.
If a formal dispute is inevitable, consider starting the process first, particularly where litigation in your counterparty's local courts is undesirable. If you are invoking force majeure, prompt and preventative action is best practice. Alternatives, including partial performance should be considered. If you are resisting force majeure, communicate rejection notices promptly and remember duties to mitigate loss. Also consider whether your local court system can process the dispute timeously; the enforced closure of some Court buildings has caused a backlog in many jurisdictions whereas the main arbitral institutions have remained functional during the pandemic.
Originally published in Energy Voice.
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe - Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2020. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.