OAL May Soon Decide Fate Of California's Proposed Commercial Financing Rules

AM
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

Contributor

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP logo
Allen Matkins, founded in 1977, is a California-based law firm with more than 200 attorneys in four major metropolitan areas of California: Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, and San Francisco. The firm's areas of focus include real estate, construction, land use, environmental and natural resources, corporate and securities, real estate and commercial finance, bankruptcy, restructurings and creditors' rights, joint ventures, and tax; labor and employment, and trials, litigation, risk management, and alternative dispute resolution in all of these areas. For more information about Allen Matkins please visit www.allenmatkins.com.
In September 2018, then Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 1235 into law. SB 1235 added a new division to the Financial Code imposing specific loan disclosure requirements on providers of commercial financings.
United States California Corporate/Commercial Law

In September 2018, then Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 1235 into law. SB 1235 added a new division to the Financial Code imposing specific loan disclosure requirements on providers of commercial financings. These disclosures include:

  • The total amount of funds provided;
  • The total dollar cost of financing;
  • The term or estimated term;
  • The method, frequency, and amount of payments;
  • A description of prepayment policies; and,
  • Until January 1, 2024, the total cost of the financing expressed as an annualized rate.

The bill required the Department of Financial Protection & Innovation (then known as the Department of Business Oversight) to adopt regulations governing these disclosures. Cal. Fin. Code § 22804. Commercial financing providers are not required to comply with the new disclosure requirements until the Commissioner's regulations are adopted and become effective. Cal. Fin. Code § 22804(c). Following four rounds of comments, the Department submitted its proposed rules to the Office of Administrative Law for review. The OAL is required to conduct a review of the Department's rulemaking record to ensure that the agency satisfied the requirements of the California Administrative Procedure Act and OAL's regulations. This review is scheduled to end this Friday, June 10. The OAL must either: (i) approve the Department's rulemaking action and file the proposed regulation with the Secretary of State; or (ii) disapprove the rulemaking action. Cal. Gov't Code § 11349.3.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More