ARTICLE
26 May 2025

Texas Takes Latest Step Toward Adopting UIDDA

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
Last month, the Supreme Court of Texas proposed new Texas Rule of Civil Procedure, 201.3, that "would adopt the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act," commonly known as the UIDDA.
United States Texas Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Takeaways

  • Texas Supreme Court proposes new rule adopting key provisions of the UIDDA to streamline interstate discovery
  • New Rule 201.3 is open for comment until August 1, 2025
  • Texas Legislature has given the Supreme Court until September 1, 2025, to adopt the UIDDA

Last month, the Supreme Court of Texas proposed new Texas Rule of Civil Procedure, 201.3, that "would adopt the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act," commonly known as the UIDDA. The rule is open for comment until Aug. 1.

The April 30 proposal is the latest step by Texas toward joining the other 47 states and the U.S. Virgin Islands that have adopted the 2007 UIDDA.1 The Texas Legislature passed H.B. 3929 back in 2023, and it took effect on Sept. 1, 2023. Though that bill prompted the Supreme Court to adopt the UIDDA, it did not contain the text from the UIDDA and only served as an invitation for the Supreme Court to consider the Act by Sept. 1.

The UIDDA streamlines the process for propounding and responding to interstate discovery. States cannot inherently enforce other states' subpoenas. While a Texas court can issue its own subpoena enforcing the out-of-state subpoena's contents, each state is free to have different procedures for doing so. The Uniform Law Commission's UIDDA was an answer to this nonuniform process across states by proposing a streamlined procedure for interstate discovery.

Footnote

1. The other two states that have not adopted it, Missouri and Massachusetts, have introduced a bill to enact the UIDDA.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More