ARTICLE
1 April 2015

CFIUS Report Reflects Continued Need To Plan For Government Scrutiny Of Cross-Border Transactions

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) recently reported its 2013 activities...
United States Antitrust/Competition Law

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) recently reported its 2013 activities, confirming the continuation of its heightened review and investigation of certain foreign direct investments in U.S. businesses.

CFIUS, a panel of high-level Washington bureaucrats, was described in a prior post. CFIUS reviews and investigates mergers and acquisitions that could result in foreign control of entities engaged in interstate commerce in the United States and determines (or recommends to the U.S. president) whether to disallow or block transactions when there is credible evidence that they threaten national security, which was covered in a prior post.

The recent report reflects the continuation of five macro-trends in the CFIUS process:

  • Parties continue to provide CFIUS with relatively large numbers of voluntary notices of direct foreign investments in U.S. businesses. In 2013, 97 such notices were provided. Although this was slightly less than the number of 2012 notices, it should be noted that the quantity of transactions reported to government agencies generally declined in 2013 compared with 2012.
  • CFIUS continues investigate more than one-third of the transactions noticed. In 2013, 47 percent of the 97 noticed transactions proceeded to investigation (including five cases that proceeded to investigation during the U.S. government shutdown). This rate of investigation is slightly greater than in recent years.
  • Asian countries – and particularly China – increasingly continued to be the subject of CFIUS proceedings. In 2013, 46 of the noticed transactions involved investors from Asian countries, with Chinese investors alone accounting for 21 transactions. This represents a 10 percent increase over the prior year's notices involving Asian countries.
  • The manufacturing sector, which includes the computer and electronics products subsector, continues to account for a plurality (36 percent) of the noticed transactions. This is not surprising since this sector encompasses the semiconductor, software, chemicals, and aerospace subsectors that are more likely to raise potential national security concerns.
  • CFIUS continues to propose and obtain remedial measures, or "mitigation," for transactions that CFIUS determines may pose potential national security concerns. CFIUS obtained mitigation for 11 of the 97 noticed transactions in 2013. (Another eight notices were withdrawn.) These measures included, for example: Limiting the persons authorized to access certain information; imposing guidelines and terms for handling existing and future U.S. government business; establishing committees; agreeing to notify the U.S. government regarding future business decisions; and establishing mechanisms to ensure compliance with remedial measures.

The macro-trends disclosed in the recent CFIUS report – continued review and investigation of transactions, particularly those involving Asian investors or manufacturing sectors – further confirm that careful consideration of CFIUS, and involvement of counsel early in the process, should continue to be on the to-do list for all cross-border transactions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More