ARTICLE
3 January 2020

Redistributing E-Books Online Constitutes Copyright Infringement, Says Top EU Court

PC
Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz

Contributor

Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz logo
Pearl Cohen is an international law firm with offices in Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Our strength is derived from decades of legal experience and an intimate knowledge of the cutting edge technological, legal, and transactional issues facing our clients in local and cross border matters. This combination of experience and knowledge allows us to provide sound and innovative advice to clients worldwide.
The CJEU ruled that second-hand distribution of e-books online constitutes a copyright-protected communication to the public that infringes the author's exclusive rights
European Union Intellectual Property

The CJEU ruled that second-hand distribution of e-books online constitutes a copyright-protected communication to the public that infringes the author’s exclusive rights under the EU Copyright Directive.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) has held that a company making available second-hand e-books on its website to members of its reading club engages in a “communication to the public” that infringes the author’s rights under the EU Directive 2001/29 on copyrights (the “Copyright Directive”). The CJEU held that the copyright rule of exhaustion, under which the copyright holder exhausts its right to control downstream uses of copyright-protected works, applies only in the context of the right to distribute tangible objects, such as printed books, where the owner of the printed book can freely dispose of the printed book.

The CJEU explained that unlike tangible objects, e-books do not deteriorate with use and are therefore perfect substitutes for new copies. These perfect copies cannot be made available to other users, by way of ‘communication to the public’, without the approval of the copyright owner of the e-book.

The court further explained that a ‘communication to the public’ occurs where the protected work is communicated using different means from those previously used, or that access is granted to a new public that was not already taken into account by the copyright holders when they authorized the initial communication to the public.

CLICK HERE to read the CJEU’s judgment.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More