ARTICLE
25 March 2020

Medicaid Telehealth Expansion And Guidance

SG
Shipman & Goodwin LLP

Contributor

Shipman & Goodwin’s value lies in our commitment -- to our clients, to the profession and to the community. We have one goal: to help our clients achieve their goals. How we accomplish it is simple: we devote our considerable experience and depth of knowledge to understand each client’s unique needs, business and industry, and then we develop solutions to meet those needs. Clients turn to us when they need a trusted advisor. With our invaluable awareness of each client’s challenges, we can counsel them at every step -- to keep their operations running smoothly, help them navigate complex business transactions, position them for future growth, or resolve business disputes. The success of our clients is of primary importance to us and our attorneys invest meaningful time getting to know the client's business and are skilled in the practice areas and industry sectors critical to that success. With more than 175 attorneys in offices throughout Connecticut, New York and in Washington, DC, we serve the needs of
As a companion piece to the earlier released "Medicare Telehealth Guidance," the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") today released Medicaid Telehealth Guidance to states.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

As a companion piece to the earlier released "Medicare Telehealth Guidance," the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") today released Medicaid Telehealth Guidance to states

CMS has released the guidance below to help states understand their options for paying Medicaid providers that use telehealth technology to deliver services in order to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and to increase access to care. A summary of CMS's guidance is set forth below:

  • States are not required to submit a state plan amendment ("SPA") to pay for telehealth services if payments for services furnished via telehealth are made in the same manner as when the service is furnished in a face-to-face setting;
     
  • However, a state would need an approved state plan payment methodology (and thus, might need to submit an SPA) to establish rates or payment methodologies for telehealth services that differ from those rates or payment methodologies applicable for the same services furnished in a face-to-face setting;
     
  • States may pay a qualified physician or other licensed practitioner at the distant site (the billing provider) and the state's payment methodology may include costs associated with the time and resources spent facilitating care at the originating site (where the patient is). The billing provider may distribute the payment to the distant and originating sites;
     
  • States may also pay for appropriate ancillary costs, such as technical support, transmission charges, and equipment necessary for the delivery of telehealth services. A state would need an approved state plan payment methodology that specifies the ancillary costs and circumstances when those costs are payable;
     
  • Ancillary costs associated with the originating site for telehealth may be incorporated into the fee-for-service rates or separately reimbursed as an administrative cost by the state when a Medicaid service is delivered. The ancillary costs must be directly related to a covered Medicaid service provided via telehealth and properly allocated to the Medicaid program; and
     
  • States are encouraged to reach out to their state lead as soon as possible if they are interested in submitting an SPA.

In addition, CMS's guidance includes sample SPA language that CMS has previously approved with respect to telehealth service expansion and payment methodologies.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More